I think I did read your request.
You can’t directly link one group to another.
But within a rich text document you can create a clickable hyperlink to a group. So you can create a list of groups, each accessible via a hyperlink, that represent some sort of association. Isn’t that what you are trying to do, i.e. represent an association?
For example, in a rich text file I can compile a list of groups related to a specific project, and using “Link To” each member of that list can be accessed. If I wish, using the “List” capabilities in a rich text file, I can even represent the hierarchy of the list in outline style. Moreover, I can add a note about the relationships between groups/subgroups that I’m representing. Such notes often save me from wondering what the heck I was thinking.
Logically, this seems to do what you were asking about. But it’s logically much more powerful, as you are not limited to one-to-one correspondences. Using this technique, a particular subgroup or document can have multiple relationships, if that’s useful to you.
I often do this kind of thing when I’m working on a project. It lets me document the relationships of material that I’m using for the project, while at the same time providing quick access to the groups and documents. I can identify useful groups/documents from anywhere within my database, that are related to my project interests.
Tip: From a view, you can select multiple groups, press Command-C to copy to the clipboard, then paste the clipboard into a plain text document. Now you have a list of the group names. If you wish to list all or selected documents contained in a group, use the same procedure. When finished, select Format > Make Rich Text, so that you can add hyperlinks. (I don’t use Wiki links much, but you’ll find that turning on Wiki links will create automatic links from the group or document names.)