Could you give us some information about the function of Time Machine and the future version DT Pro/Office 2.0?
There are contradictory postings in the forums:
Christian wrote in the German forums regarding DT 2.0 and Time Machine:
I read: For being able to use Time Machine in DT 2.0 without copying the complete database every hour, DT has to change his database structure. DT programmers are working on this. Right?
But I found also an answer by Annard, regarding Time Machine and the database package in 2.0:
Another posting by Eric Boehnisch (German forums, same day as Christians statement about adjusting the database structure) makes me believe, there is no possibility to make the database readable for Time Machine:
My interpretation of these two statements: Because DT Pro is able to handle more than one database, you cannot change the database structure. Only solution could be Apple changes Time Machine, because they have similar problems with their Aperture databases too.
Are DT Pro/Office programmers looking for a solution to make their database package readable for Time Machine or are they waiting what Apple is doing?
Both statements are correct. Contents like RTF/RTFD or web archives won’t be stored in the .database files anymore. All contents will be stored a separate as separate files in the “Files” folder.
This means that we will still use packages but won’t create huge database files anymore. Therefore it’s up to Apple to treat packages (used by many applications, e.g. Pages, TextEdit etc.) in the right way.
Thank you, Christian, for helping me to understand.
How small will these databases be?
For instance: My 10 databases within the DT package are now around 2 GB, 300 WebArchives, 30.000 RTF, 4000 HTML documents. Will these documents be converted into the new file-system and therefore tidy up the database? And enlarge the files-folder? (Now 1,6 GB)
So far I had no problems with the packages created by Pages or Scrivener. (I don’t own Aperture.) Are there no problems using these applications and Time Machine because their databases are so much smaller than those of DT Pro? Are they using another package, i.e. database system?
I really understand nothing about programming, I know. But I have to decide, whether it is worth waiting for the upcoming release or if it is time to finally make the switch to another application. My database is growing and growing, sometimes I have the impression I spend more time with all these workarounds creating Backup Archives and splittings databases, importing and exporting and reimporting and arranging files and folders, than really working and using the collected data…
Yes and yes. But if Time Machine is smart enough (and hopefully it is), it won’t back up the complete Files folder all the time whereas the database files of v1.x are backed up almost all the time as they’re modified quite often.
All applications using a database have the same issues as DEVONthink 1.x and all applications using packages have the same issues as DEVONthink 2 will have.