My question takes a little explanation … sorry for the length…
As a historian, I’ve been creating notes in DT. By my system, an
abbreviated citation for the source goes into the “Name” field, while
a label (basically an abbreviated summary consisting of a few words)
goes into the Comment field. I use essentially two categories of notes
– chronological notes and subject notes.
For each chronological note, I create the label (in the Comment field)
by beginning with an asterisk, then the date. For example:
*1921 08 21 John takes a trip
For each subject note, I begin with an @, followed by a standard
subject, followed by a year and a brief summary. For example:
@hobbies/1924/John's favorite hobby was sailing
Now, here’s my problem. I’ve been planning to sort my notes into Smart
Groups for particular chronological periods, or particular subjects.
for example: all chronological notes for 1921
or: all subject notes about hobbies.
But when I construct a search using the * (asterisk), for
chronological notes, or the @ for subject notes, the search mechanism
appears not to recognize those symbols. For example, let’s say I ask
for all notes with labels in the Comment field beginning *1921
(meaning that I want ONLY those notes with Comment labels that include
the exact search term *1921 – and NOT Comment labels that include
“1921” WITHOUT the preceding asterisk. When I do that, “Search”
appears to ignore the asterisk, and simply returns all notes with
Comment labels including “1921.” The same thing happens with searches
using the @ sign.
Can anyone tell me what I should do differently?