Wow, been a while since I created this thread, and didn’t know there was as much answers.
All the arguments in favor of DT here are absolutely true. I realized after trying other apps that none have the power of DT. It’s transparent when you use the app, but once you face the limitations of the competition you know what you miss. Being able to preview virtually any file format for instance.
Well, it doesn’t remove the fact that some of the UI could be improved. As I said in my first post, preview of text files (any format, from rich text to simple txt, along with web archives) is really hard to read for me. The text is glued to the borders of the window for once, and setting “80%” width doesn’t change a thing.
What I really miss in the UI is something alongside iDocument interface. But of course, it would be really long to change it so drastically without encountering lot of bugs in the process, or having to work really hard so that no features are lost along the way. So I understand why such UI improvements have not been done. Although I think that something easier would be to allow more customization (like left pane or columns colors for instance), something that make DT better to read.
That’s really my only complaint about the app: there’s a lot of informations to read at once, and I find it hard to find quickly what I want on the screen (not search wise, but really what’s in front of me). The theme is white, while I really read better with darker themes (not black, but darker colors).
So here it is, what I miss from the powerful DT
I’m very glad to hear about DTtoGo v2 btw ! The few previews are really encouraging, and I can’t wait to put my bucks into the app
EDIT: /I also notice that CSS stylesheets do not work with webarchives… Is it normal ?/ --> Need to restart and it works/ Another bug is that the “actions” button in the toolbar does not work in fullscreen…