This has been a constant discussion that rears its head on the DT forum, the Mellel forum, and Bookends forum, and this is my latest attempt to get these three companies to work together.
Mac needs a writer’s suite. We need a powerful integrated package to do our research and writing. Mac needs an equivalent to PC’s Nota Bene. I recently met Mac users at a conference who are going to run Parallels specifically to use Nota Bene, and I don’t blame them. There is nothing of comparison for Mac, and I hate being jealous of a PC user. I was drooling at the Nota Bene presentation.
If I had the money, I would pay each of these programmer’s to do this- honestly! But I don’t, and I can only hope that instead the programmer’s will see the potential for making money by working together to form an integrated writer’s suite.
I believe that these 3 programs are the best in their area. Although there are alot of imitators, no one touches DEVONthink. Mellel has come to be the serious rival to Word, and already surpasses Word in very significant areas. It is a powerful processor for serious academic writers and is only going to get better (unlike Word which has fallen into a hole and doesn’t seem to know it). Bookends is the bibliographic manager to beat. Its formatting capabilities and aesthetic feel far surpass Endnote and Sente. To top it off, all of these companies offer excellent support and have very active forums and are easy on the wallet.
This post is going to be cross-posted in the three forums, along with a poll. What I would like to see is not only a vote, but I want posters to imagine that this integration will become a reality. How would you like to see them integrated? What functionality needs to happen? Hopefully it will jolt the developer’s into action. And this is my last attempt at trying to make this happen. If there is still no movement forward, well the owner of Nota Bene said he’d give me a free copy.
Also, even if you do not have any ideas but nonetheless would like to see this integration, please post indicating which of these 3 programs you currently use, and your full name. I’m hoping that enough people will add their name that the companies will want to act on this.
So here are my suggestions for an integrated suite of DEVONthink, Mellel, and Bookends.
- I do not want DT to be able to edit Mellel or Bookends- they do that perfectly fine on their own. But searching them simultaneously is a huge priority, especially being able to use DT’s AI.
- The Bookends Database(s) file should be viewable from in DT, and the ability to “copy citation” from within DT would be great.
- If I am looking at a particular BE citation in DT, double-clicking should bring that citation to the front in Bookends
- Similarily, Mellel documents are fully viewable in DT (like PDF’s are now). Double-clicking opens the document in Mellel.
- Mellel documents should be able to be saved within the DT database. This avoids two copies of Mellel documents- one in the finder one in the DT database. This also means Mellel documents can be moved around in the database to different folders and are not ‘stuck’ in an indexed folder section.
- DT’s wiki-links need to be enable in the Mellel files as well as the BE files.
- The BE database in DT needs to indicate its attachment file(s) so that they will automatically be wiki-linked and quickly accessed within the DT database. (DT can already index the BE attachments folder)
8 ) A single shortcut key in Mellel and Bookends should launch a DT search of whatever word the cursor is placed in / or highlighted. - A .txt or .rtf file in DT should be able to be opened via a contextual menu choice in Mellel. This would be beneficial to those who first draft and write out things in DT but then want to move it to Mellel.
- There needs to be an easy way to add wiki-link BE citation to files in the DT database.
- If there could be one field in BE that could somehow be edited directly from DT, it is definitely the Notes field.
- If the BE database could somehow retain its groups when viewed in DT, that would be great.
Please add your suggestions, critiques, names. This needs your voice.