Am I right that the real value of a search – the ranking of the results according to relevance – is LOST when the search is saved as a smart group, which sticks you with useless options such as Name and Kind?
That’s a pretty serious oversight. Why not have it save the search as Unsorted, where the unsorted sequence is really the relevance-rank, passed from the search?
Hello. Any updates on this? Will PB9 finally allow Smart Groups, whose very purpose is to indicate the frequency of a search term in files by ordering the latter by relevance, to be saved in a meaningful order? The value of a Smart Group is, ironically, destroyed by saving it.
An easy solution: add an Unsorted ordering to the Smart Groups, and make this their default.