I tried to search carefully whether my issue is already in the forum but couldn’t find anything - let me apologise in advance if I missed something!
My question:
Is there a way to create a “Master Note” as an overview or perhaps entry page to a group or Data Base like a Table of contents with links and the attached labels? There is a script unter “scripts - new - markdown see-also” which comes quite close but the information given there is unstructured and overwhelming so it wouldn’t be of practical use for every day’s needs.
Thank you all in advance so much for any assistance!
It’s unclear what exactly this master note should contain (a Markdown example or a screenshot would be useful) but did you have a look at Tools > Create Table of Contents?
Thanks a lot to you all for so very immedate answers!
I attach a screenshot of my colleagues “Master Note” in Notion. I don’t want to switch to an online database, but this special feature would be great to have.
I also attach a screenshot from my DT, where you can see that Create table of contents (German: Inhaltsverzeichnis) in my case isn’t active.
It creates a new Markdown record in the parent group of the selected group:
# MasterNode for group images
name | creationDate | modificationDate | label | tags
|--|--|--|--|--
img-half-width | Fri Jun 10 2022 14:23:43 GMT+0200 (Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit) | Sat Jun 18 2022 11:07:06 GMT+0200 (Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit) | 0 |
,Blockquote-1 | Fri Jun 10 2022 14:23:43 GMT+0200 (Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit) | Sat Jun 18 2022 11:07:06 GMT+0200 (Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit) | 0 |
,Blockquote-2 | Fri Jun 10 2022 14:23:43 GMT+0200 (Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit) | Sat Jun 18 2022 11:07:06 GMT+0200 (Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit) | 0 |
If there are tags, they are listed as comma-separated values after the label. The date formatting is just the default JavaScript variant, it would have to be modified to be useful.
The properties to be put into the table are stored at the top of the code in the array properties. If you need user-defined metadata as well, you’d have to handle that differently.
I did only basic testing with a group containing only documents, i.e. no other groups. This case would perhaps need special handling.