I have some data that is quite static.
And even more, I would only change things on the Mac, in DEVONthink, but never ever on an iDevice.
(For example for indexed content that depends on a folder on Mac)
So, is there an option to open a database in DTTG in read-only mode?
And always automatically open it in read-only mode?
If not, that would be a GREAT thing to add
P.S. I searched the PDF for âread-onlyâ but could not find anything.
The same feature would also be nice for DEVONthink, but less important to me.
A read-only mode would be great for sharing with, for instance, a partner who doesnât use the computer very muchâŚgood use of the second seat on the DTP license for individual users and possibly useful to server owners as well (though maybe DTP server allows setting a database to read only).
In the the way that read-only DBs could be skipped for further analysis and syncing when the flag is available on the sync location.
Another implementation (maybe even better implementation) would be to check for a local flag. If itâs set to read-only the database should be treated that way, until a user chooses to remove the flag. In that case the databases should first (re)sync âonline to localâ and after that become writable again. Now itâs possible to leave DTTG databases open for reference, but without frequent updates.
A read-only mode on an iPhone or iPad would be desirable. On these devices, you can very easily accidentally swipe a folder without even noticing it right awayâŚ
How would one sync from a read-write DB on one machine to a read-only one on another? There is already a âlockedâ mode for groups and files. Maybe that helps (I donât know if that status is synced and what it entails on i*OS).
As to throwing away things in the trash: Thereâs no r/o trash, either. Backups are there for this kind of mishap. By âclick on the trashâ I didnât mean to actually click and empty the trash â on i*OS, you swipe left, then a trash icon appears on the right, and you click that to move the file to the trash. Just like with Mail, e.g.
Donât understand.
What has the synchronization to do with a read-only database?
The read-only would be to make sure that no local changes can happen - of course remote changes would be unaffectedâŚ
I also donât get your point about the trash.
AnywaysâŚ
If itâs really read-only, synching would not be possible. If itâs only âlocallyâ read-only, a group/file deleted on another machine would be deleted, too.
Iâm not arguing against the idea. Iâm asking about the concrete behavior thatâs desired.
Thatâs a fact and thanks for the reminder, but does nothing against a wrongly trashed file - or you would need to check your trash bin very close to make sure that it contains nothing that should not be deleted