What happens if both “Assign existing tags” and “Add Chat …” are selected? Does DEVONthink use its own classification logic to add tags, and then Chat makes an AI API call? What if the tags suggested by DEVONthink and Chat (“AI API”) are the same? How many tags does Chat assign…?
But you’ve set your prefs to import finder tags and convert hashtags to tags as well as assigning existing tags. All these settings might well cause new tags to be created, I guess.
Ich lese mal das Handbuch vor. Das ist die verbindliche Quelle für solche Fragen.
Hashtags: Popularized in social media, hashtags are a type of tag prefixed by a # . If enabled in the Tags settings, DEVONthink can detect hashtags in the contents of text-based files and convert them to tags for the file automatically. Removing the hashtags from the content will remove the tags from the file. Hashtags do not support spaces in them and they should be listed on a separate line. They will not be detected within existing paragraphs. Of special note, hashtags supports creating nested tags as noted here. The first tag just needs to be prefixed with the # to be detected as a hashtag..
tags: furniture, shopping, tableware: these are the tags I was using recently today for other items!
I’m starting to think, there is something off in DT, because earlier today, I was assigning tags to my imported bookmarks using chat (“AI”). and while the tags assigned by the chat were mostly ok, there were always off by one entry.
That is, entry 2 had tags which were more appropriate to entry 1; entry 3 had tags for entry 2 and so on and on…
If you’re really importing a PNG, it does not have any textual information. What do you suggest DT uses as tags in this case if you ask it to assign existing tags?
I’m starting to think, there is something off in DT, because earlier today, I was assigning tags to my imported bookmarks using chat (“AI”). and while the tags assigned by the chat were mostly ok, there were always off by one entry.
That is, entry 2 had tags which were more appropriate to entry 1; entry 3 had tags for entry 2 and so on and on…
If it were me and the tags were relevant to me, I’d assign them manually. Or with an automation that I control. Leaving it to some unspecified algorithm doesn’t make much sense to me. Especially not if the data provides no information at all. As is the case with images.
Please zip the file that you imported and upload it or send it to cgrunenberg - at - devon-technologies.com. It’s unlikely that it’s a bug so far but I would like to check this.
Finally, did you verify that the file has no Finder tags and that none of your smart rules could cause this?
I turned it off as DT did assign existing tags, but I got far more than I wanted. For example; it would assign the tag “news” if the document contained the word ‘new’ anywhere.
I prefer to assign tags manually or by using a script that assigns tags based a document containing a few key words like ‘meeting’ to tag it with “meeting”.